|
INTRODUCTION
The motivation for
this book comes from my sons Michael,
Cory and Marcus. I want them to know what it means to be a
Blackman beyond what their western education tells them. This work is my
attempt as a Blackman and a father too past on to my sons and their sons
the Africentric worldview.
I want them to know
what the Blackman achieved before America called him a "nigger". I want
them to know the Black man is feared because no other man on earth
threatens the White man's sense of manhood like a Blackman.
Black men threaten
White men in a way that Hispanic, Asian and Arab men don't. This fear is
ancient and you can trace it to its origins in the first Indo-Aryan
invasions of Black civilization.
Understand the
Whiteman’s ancient fear and you began to understand why the economic,
legal and political systems oppress Black men in America today.
In an Essence
magazine article dated November 1992 author Joel Dreyfuss asked a panel
of white men "what is it about black men that scares white men so?”.
The answers were very
enlightening especially those of noted intellectual Andrew Hacker who
says,
"It could be that all
white people do feel guilty for what we have done to black people but we
don't admit it in so many words and sometimes the vehemence of our
denial—we don't owe them anything—seems to suggest that perhaps a number
of us do feel that something is owed…our fear of black men is that they
are so physical they can hurt us, in addition, what can they do to our
women? And once again, whether it's Willie Horton or Mike Tyson, somehow
the black rapist inflicts more damage than a white rapist ever could.
This comes back to the physical; the potency the strength there, the
rape has overtones of miscegenation, planting a seed, mongrelizing our
pure race. That fear partly sexual goes back a long way, and that comes
down to the fact that we white men regard black men as better sexual
performers than we are. We don't say this publicly, but we say, 'gee
they're so natural' and we began to wonder. 'Our women could they not be
attracted to that? Oh, they won't tell us that they're attracted to
black men' and that really drives us up the wall. Therefore all our
efforts to de-man black men. The most graphic was lynching, of course,
but now we put them in cages, called prisons, again to de-male them. we
can't call them 'boy' but we still somehow can make sure they don’t have
jobs, make sure they don't threaten us in other ways we don't give young
black men, starting at a certain age, a chance to develop impressive
careers in this country"
Andrew Hacker's
comments were honest and clearly confirm the economic castration of the
Blackman and the Whiteman's ‘Fear of The Blackman’.
The Africentric
worldview is based on the historic facts from the Blackman’s
prospective. This work gives a small insight into early world racial
history and the ancient conflict between White and Black men.
A battle for world
supremacy beginning in the bronze-age which formed the historic basis
for the ‘Fear of the Blackman’.
In obscure writings
White historians will sometimes give you a glimpse. A book called "Six
Thousand Years of history" states,
"these wars were
fought out not merely to decide the fate of two cities or empires, but
to determine which of the two races the Indo-Germanic otherwise
indo-European or Aryan or the Semitic, should have the dominion of the
world…on the one side the Aryan has the genius for war, government and
legislation on the other side the Semitic the spirit of industry,
navigation and commerce"
If you substitute the
word 'Black' for 'Semitic' you would have an somewhat accurate
statement.
Serious White
historians know this fact very well they also know to tell the truth
would reveal the dominate position of the Blackman in the bronze-age.
What some white
historians call ‘Semitic’ was Black bronze-age civilization which I date
from about 4500 B.C. the time of the first dynasty’s of Egypt and
Mesopotamia to 202 B.C. and the defeat of the Black general known to
history as “Hannibal” at the battle of Zama in North Africa by the
Aryan-Romans.
What western history
doesn’t tell you is this 4000 year period was mostly a period of World
Empire for the Blackman. In contrast
the White man for
most of this period and beyond was a nomad barbarian with a special
talent only for warfare.
Everything else was a
gift of conquest over Black bronze-age civilization. The destruction of
the Blackman as a world power and builder of the world’s first
civilization has been so complete White historians do not even want to
acknowledge how it happen.
Here at the dawn of
the 21st century in the “End of days” the Truth about Race and History
is being revealed in various ways.
While this work may
appear to some as anti-white it’s not, the Truth is both the
Aryan-Whiteman and the Islamic-Arab man has been an invader, enslaver
and destroyer of Black people, Black culture and Black civilization.
I attack White
historians and intellectuals when they support the racists Aryan-Western
model of history. Besides Whites have attacked Black people for
centuries in their writings and still do so today.
In the 21st century
the Blackman has reestablish himself with his Africentric worldview and
we don’t need the approval or validation of Western academia for our
worldview.
The Truth is America
needs its version of the South African 'Truth and Reconciliation
Commission' This national soul bearing was a kind of mass therapy for
South Africans, Black and White as they talked about their painful past.
White America has not
yet shown the courage of White south Africans how ironic would it be if
South Africans solve their racial problems before the United States.
White America's fear
is if they admit their crimes it would reveal the fact that they are
indeed liable for reparations to African-Americans. This unspoken fear
is one reason that keeps America from having any meaningful discussions
on Race there are others.
An example of White
intellectual racism is a book published in 1918 "Six Thousand years of
history". It says;
"of all the races of
mankind the only one whose history is important for us is the Caucasian
or white race to which belong the people of those states and empires of
old the Egyptian, the Assyrian, the Babylonian, the Hebrew, the
Phoenician, the Hindu, the Persian, the Greek, and the roman. This race
is historical, because it displays the most highly civilized type of
mankind that type whose progress and achievements are the true province
of history. This grand stock the Caucasian race has been classified into
three main branches the Aryan or indo-European, the Semitic and the
Hamitic. It is the Aryans that have been the parents of new nations, and
that have reached the highest point of intellectual development, as
shown in their political freedom, and in their science, literature and
art. The glory of the Aryan element is shown in the fact that the
ancient Greek and roman, the modern German, Englishman, American and
Frenchman are all of Aryan race. The Caucasian presents us with the
highest type among the five families of man. The Aryan branch of the
Caucasian family presents us with the noblest pattern of that highest
type. The Aryan in history shows all that is most worthy of renown in
energy, and enterprise, and skill, and claims of right the foremost
place on history's page. The study of these Aryan tongues has also told
what progress had been made by this, the king of races, before the time
arrived for starting south and west, to fill, to conquer, and to
civilize the western world"
That is the
Aryan-Western model of history this White supremacists worldview is
still very much alive today.
Most whites today
would have no problem agreeing with most if not all of the above
comments this is what western education teaches them.
The only half-true
comment in the whole statement is the end when they say “the progress
made by this the king of races”.
This work not only
gives a clearer view of the Africentric worldview. But I also look at
the so-called “king of races” the Whiteman, his origins and how and when
he got to the position of world power.
The work of the
historian is always built on those who came before him thus I give
thanks to the many historians both black and white whose works I have
quoted in these pages. Even when I disagreed with the conclusions of
white historians in many cases they supplied me with useful data.
This book is a
response to the Aryan model of history and looks into why the Whiteman
‘fears the Blackman’ despite his claims of superiority?
Besides his sexual
fears is this fear based on the knowledge that Black men built
civilizations in Egypto-Ethiopia, Mesopotamia, Crete, China and in the
Americas?
Serious White
historians know they were tribes of nomad barbarians when the foundation
of world civilization was built by Blackmen.
An example is
Percival Spear I will quote him from his book "India a Modern History"
as he explains the origins of the word "Aryan". He writes,
"Who were the Aryans?
We do not in fact know who the original Aryans were, or what they called
themselves. the word "arya" signifies "kinsman" and by derivation
"noble" the people thus called were apparently a group of tribes which
emerged from the
steppes of south
Russia and central Asia during the second millennium B.C. one group
entered Europe to become the ancestors of the Greeks, other tribes found
their way into Asia minor and others entered Iran. This eastern stream
subdivided, one branch settling in Iran or Persia itself to found
Persian civilization, and the other moving eastward to enter India. All
these tribes had the common physical characteristics of fair skin and
blue eyes"
Another esteemed
White historian Will Durant gives us another look at Caucasian origins
in his book "Our Oriental Heritage". He writes,
"Who were these
marauding Aryans? They themselves used the term as meaning noblemen but
perhaps this patriotic derivation is one of those after-thoughts which
cast scandalous gleams of humor.” (Monier-Williams derives Aryan from
the Sanskrit root, to plough. on this theory the word Aryan originally
meant not nobleman but peasant) very probably they came from the Caspian
region which their Persian cousins called "the Aryan home" about the
same time that the Aryan Kassites overran Babylonia and the Vedic Aryans
began to enter India…we conclude that the Mitannans, the Hittites, the
Kassites, the Sogdians, the Bactrian’s, the Medes, the Persians and the
Aryan invaders of India were branches of an already heterogeneous
"indo-European" stock which spread out from the shores of the Caspian
Sea."
So it is historically
correct to call Whites either Caucasian or Indo-Aryans their ancient
tribal name. Although the Nazi's of Hitler's Germany gave the "Aryan"
name a bad reputation it is a historically correct name.
I use "Aryan" along
with White, Anglo-Saxon, Caucasian, Indo-European, and Nordic as
historic names for White people.
Few Western
historians will tell the full story of man's racial history to do so
would challenge the Aryan model of history so deeply ingrained in
western culture.
The Africentric
worldview destroys the racism and lies that are the Aryan-western model
of history. One fact I will emphasize again and again is that serious
White historians are not ignorant of the truth about history and in many
cases they themselves confirm the Africentric worldview.
This point is driven
home by Will Durant from his book "Our Oriental Heritage", take note of
his title, it says all that needs to be said as to how Black history is
hidden and distorted by modern White historians even when they give
correct factual data. He writes,
"in this rough
theater of teeming peoples and conflicting cultures were developed the
agriculture and commerce, the horse and wagon, the coinage and letters
of credit, the crafts and industries, the law and government, the
mathematics and medicine, the enemas and drainage systems, the geometry
and astronomy, the calendar and clock and zodiac, the alphabet and
writing, the paper and ink, the books libraries and schools, the
literature and music, the sculpture and architecture, the glazed pottery
and fine furniture, the monotheism and monogamy, the cosmetics and
jewelry, the checkers and dice, the ten-pins and income-tax, the
wet-nurses and beer, from which our own European and American culture
derive by a continuous succession through the mediation of Crete and
Greece and Rome. The "Aryans" did not establish civilization they took
it from Babylon and Egypt. Greece did not begin civilization it
inherited far more civilization than it began, it was the spoiled heir
of three millenniums of arts and sciences brought to its cities from the
near east by the fortunes of trade and war. In studying and honoring the
near east we shall be acknowledging a debt long due to the real founders
of European and American civilization"
This esteemed Western
historian has just explained the Africentric worldview exactly.
He repeats what
Africentric historians have said all-along but because he calls this
culture and civilization “Oriental” and the region “near East” the
Blackman today is denied all credit in western history books for the
development of world civilization.
There were many Black
historians, nationalists, and intellectuals over the last 150 years who
worked to reveal the truth and develop the Africentric worldview.
A worldview that
includes African-Americans and Africans a worldview that embraces people
of African descent wherever they live in the world.
The battle over the
validity of Africentric based education is an attempt by whites to
maintain their control over the education of Black children. It should
be needless to say people who do not control the education of its
children are doomed.
This work is an
Africentric prospective on race, history and contemporary racial
relations and though I wrote with Black America in mind White America
also need to know the Africentric worldview.
By what right do I
dare write a book about History and Race? What are my academic
qualifications for this work? Tireless research over thirty years and
living the life of a Blackman in America.
I have no academic
reputation or prestigious university job to protect I can speak the
truth about the Blackman’s place in history without fear of the academic
establishment unlike some historians both Black and White.
You will learn more
about Race and history from reading this book then you would learn in
eight years of college. The Truth will free whites as well as Blacks
from the lingering effects of slavery, segregation and the ideology of
white supremacy.
The Truth must be
told if America is to free itself from its racists past. I do not write
this book with hatred in my heart in many cases it is very small groups
of Whites who plot to control the destiny of Black people.
However the White
population in general has and still profits from the system of
institutional racism despite their denials.
Even more important
the ‘body of Christ’ will expand and advance when the false ideology of
White supremacy supported by White institutions is destroyed.
The contributions of
the Blackman to world civilization must be acknowledged anything less
will doom us to continued racial conflict. That is why it will also
require the reeducation of whites if racism is to be destroyed in
America.
Some would no doubt
say 'conflict' is too strong of a term to use but in response I would
say the conditions some if not most Black people face on this planet
amount to nothing less than Genocide.
And we are within our
rights to quote Malcolm to "resist by any means necessary" the attempt
to destroy us. Black people will fight against oppression and domination
no matter who the oppressors are Whites, Arabs or Asians.
It is now a well
established fact that Africa is the birth place of mankind and that the
world’s first people were Black. Western scientist themselves have
proven this yet Western historians have not yet caught up to this fact.
|
